| Центр международных программ |
Критерии оценивания работ командного первенства
| POINTS & CRITERIA | 3 POINTS The speakers: |
2 POINTS The speakers: |
1 POINT The speakers: |
| 1. CONTENT | -Handles the topic with ease and confidence; | -Handles the topic with relative ease and confidence although expressing some hesitation; | -Has difficulties handling the topic; |
| -Give detailed information; | -Need to expand on ideas or details a bit more; | -Fail to give detailed information; | |
| 2. LANGUAGE | -Speaks with sufficient accuracy, clarity, and precision to convey their intended message without misrepresentation or confusion; | -Speaks with enough accuracy, clarity, and precision to convey their intended message. Occasional misrepresentation or confusion is present; | -Speech lacks accuracy, clarity, and precision. The conveyed message is misrepresented and confusing; |
| -Demonstrates the ability to use accurately the major time frames of past, present, and future; | -Demonstrates the ability to use the major time frames of past, present and future with relative accuracy; | -Do not demonstrate control over the major time frames: past, present, and future; | |
| -Uses fairly extensive vocabulary; | - Attempt to use fairly extensive vocabulary, but is not consistent in these attempts; | - Vocabulary significantly lacks in extensiveness; | |
| 3. PRONUNCIATION PRONUNCIATION AND SOUND QUALITY | - Are easily understood; | - Are relatively easily understood; | - Understood, with some difficulties; |
| 4. QUALITY OF THE VIDEO | - High quality; | - Mediocre; | - Poor quality; |
| 5. CREATIVITY | - Use creative ideas and critical thinking skills to express their opinion; | -Demonstrate the ability to use critical thinking skills with relative accuracy; | -Fail to use creative ideas and critical thinking skills to express their opinion; |